Scathing criticism of the Pope and the Church against the Argentinian political system: “The president has little time left”
Argentine President Alberto Fernandez and the political and power struggle that emerged from the cataclysm of the Sunday September 12 primary elections have received scathing criticism from the Pope and the Catholic Church.
On Sunday, September 12, the Argentine electorate went to polling stations to confirm the candidates for the November 14 midterm elections, and in a surprising result not even predicted by the most reliable opinion polls, or by the arrogant outgoing Kirchnerites, it was a landslide victory. for the opposition in 17 of the 24 provinces. If this synopsis is repeated in November, it could be a major disaster and the Kirchnerites could even lose control of the Senate.
In coincidence with the election results and the weeklong struggle over what the next steps the government should take, especially with Vice President Cristina Kirchner reminding Alberto Fernandez that she has the voices and has it chosen to be president, while dissident Alverso insisted he was president and would make the decisions, there were heartbreaking statements from two archbishops, one of them seen as the Pope’s spokesperson , Victor Manuel Fernandez, and the second from the president of the Argentine Bishops’ Conference, Oscar Vicente Ojeda.
In a letter published in La Nacion, entitled “President, is there little time left?”, Bishop Fernandez points out that in the face of the wounded homeland, “many of us expect the president to be able to make a revision of his agenda of priorities “. to avoid a debacle that would hurt our people even more ??.
We saw you having fun with abortion, marihuana and even euthanasia as the poor and middle class went through deep unanswered distress. In recent months, we have also seen a strong rise in “non-binary” technology. language which, for the great majority of people, has no interest. We are in Latin America and in the midst of a pandemic when circumstances demand the attention of other more pressing issues. At the end of last year, as neighboring countries were buying vaccines, Argentina’s public health ministry got excited about an abortion campaign. We have to admit that now was not the right time or the most pressing of issues.
The women the government thought it was serving actually had their families in tatters, their children out of school, some into drugs, others into delinquency, while the value of money dwindled every day.
The social agenda has been muddled and a great opportunity has been ruined. We should not be surprised by the strong abstention from voters who did not feel represented by other political options but who were too angry to vote. It is more than eloquent that in some poor neighborhoods the abstention reached 40% since a campaign with few real proposals and too many slogans did not inspire enthusiasm.
?? The president still has time to give priority to the main social problems, and to better tackle production, and work, which are what can be listed as the real demands if we are alongside the people. We must not forget that during the previous election, Mauricio Macri was able to recover a large part of the points lost in the primary. He did this not with clever proposals, but with a huge effort to get closer to people and at least listen to their real demands.
?? From a strategist, you expect the ability to read in the current historical moment the real and main demands of the people, leaving aside their own tastes. But sometimes politics can be confusing believing that talking about certain issues is an answer to society’s expectations, and in reality you only please minority groups close to power. It’s not the Argentine people, and the votes seem to have shown that. Still, some members of the government seem to think the solution is to become more radicalized, not realizing that this only brings you closer to the bottom line.
Who wouldn’t forgive the president for his missteps with his little parties at the Olivos Residence if they had felt him closer to their real problems? The point is that those who did like him were “fools”? when in reality they were only asking for a respectful debate on abortion while those who thought differently were called “hypocrites”. It was not the image many had when they voted for him. The majority voted it exactly the opposite and people are sometimes too sensitive to certain things.
But our people are generous and able to give another opportunity to those who can step back and resume. Hopefully this will happen, so that we can rebuild an economy that has been damaged for years and begin to resolve the hardships of the ailing large majorities. There are already too many people tired of waiting, concluded the Archbishop of La Plata ??.
Bishop of San Isidro and President of the Episcopal Conference Oscar Vicente Ojeda was not so blunt, more ecclesiastical, but warned that the country’s political establishment was “discussing power, not a project of Nation “.
Ojeda draws a parallel with the situation where Jesus was to be crucified and told his apostles, who then began to wonder among themselves, who was to be the greatest in the Kingdom. ?? They started discussing power ??
They believed that Jesus the Messiah was going to give up the power, the temporal power, and the vanity of each of them surfaced: who is going to be number one, some feel better and deserve better than others, which is so human ??
And in Argentina, we also talk about power, we do not discuss a project for the Nation, we do not discuss where we are going, we do not think about where to go, we cannot accept to think either. together, we are content to discuss power, media power, economic power, political power ??.
Finally, as the apostles discussed who would be number one, Jesus bleeding on the cross tried to communicate with them so that they could understand him. So many times we, and in Argentina, fall into the trap of power discussions, without daring to think together where we are going ”.